From: Tim Freeman (tim_at_fungible.com)
Date: Fri 30 Jan 2004 - 04:29:32 GMT
From: Liam Helmer <linuxlists_at_thevenue.org>
>I like option a; I think that using the LSM framework is the best way to
>go, and ensures that you have a whole lot less work in the future ->
>instead of patching in a vserver framework, instead you have a more
>established API that will be less of a moving target to develop against.
Does anyone know where the LSM framework is sufficient to implement vserver?
The grsecurity patches, for instance, don't use LSM because it isn't
flexible enough.
-- Tim Freeman tim_at_fungible.com GPG public key fingerprint ECDF 46F8 3B80 BB9E 575D 7180 76DF FE00 34B1 5C78 _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver