About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Herbert Poetzl (herbert_at_13thfloor.at)
Date: Mon 08 Dec 2003 - 22:13:26 GMT


On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 01:22:46PM +0100, Jan Zuchhold wrote:
> 2.4.22ctx-17c: works, no problem
> 2.4.22-vs1.00: does not work, fcntl broken
> 2.4.23-vs1.20: does not work, fcntl broken

okay, we have to do some testing, as I announced
before ...

http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/patch-net01-2.4.22-ctx17c-vs1.00.diff

this patch should be applied to 2.4.22ctx-17c with

 # patch -p1 <../patch-net01-2.4.22-ctx17c-vs1.00.diff

and to 2.4.22-vs1.00 with

 # patch -R -p1 <../patch-net01-2.4.22-ctx17c-vs1.00.diff

resulting in two kernels, one called

 linux-2.4.22ctx-17c-net01

and the other

 linux-2.4.22-vs1.00-net01r

there should be _no_ warning or error in the process
of patching both kernels, otherwise we have different
kernels (which would be interesting)

now I would like you to check both kernels with the
same .config file and do the following (to compile)

 # make mrproper
 # cp ../TEST.config .config
 # make oldconfig
 # make dep >../Dep.log
 # make bzImage modules >../Build.log

install and test ...

TIA,
Herbert

PS: didn't find a difference, and unfortunately
    could not reproduce yet ...

_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view
[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Mon 08 Dec 2003 - 22:14:35 GMT by hypermail 2.1.3