From: Mihai RUSU (dizzy_at_roedu.net)
Date: Thu 13 Nov 2003 - 12:46:56 GMT

• Previous message: Herbert Poetzl: "Re: [Vserver] Charlie Tries to Become a Kernel Hacker"
• In reply to: Dariush Pietrzak: "[Vserver] VServer vs Proftpd"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:

> Hi,
> a quick followup on proftpd problems, workaround is to use chbind either
> for proftpd or for whole vserver.
> Although muddleftpd and other ftpds work ok with vserver I think the
> problem is with ctx...
> ( proftpd spews error messages about not being able to bind to port '0',
> when application tries to bind to port '0', kernel should give it back the
> socket for any available port. Seems like this semantics is broken with
> ctx )
> Anyone clairvoyant enough to locate an error based on this muddy
> description?

Whats your problem? I have 2 proftds runing with chcontext/chbind and they
worked since first try, I never knew there are special issues with
proftpd.

- --
Mihai RUSU Email: dizzy_at_roedu.net
GPG : http://dizzy.roedu.net/dizzy-gpg.txt WWW: http://dizzy.roedu.net
                       "Linux is obsolete" -- AST
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/s31CPZzOzrZY/1QRAqGuAJsGXmAJ2+svnNreq19THLB+BLfKQQCeNrEC
Tw9cKHB6DrruDuDo7lTeiUg=
=Vn8H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

• Previous message: Herbert Poetzl: "Re: [Vserver] Charlie Tries to Become a Kernel Hacker"
• In reply to: Dariush Pietrzak: "[Vserver] VServer vs Proftpd"