From: Herbert Poetzl (herbert_at_13thfloor.at)
Date: Wed 12 Nov 2003 - 21:45:18 GMT
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:38:17PM +0100, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> > It`s version 1.2.5 as i think ( Debian 3.0 R1 stable ).
> > There is no problem or anything.
> That's not really helpfull you know... I've got one server where it has
> been running for more then a year ( and quite busy too, with significant
> percentage of transfer being TLS/encrypted, with load avg between 0.3 and
> 5.0, and on quite interesting hardware;) ), I've got another one where it
> was working, and then after power failure it stopped working, until I
> created new empty vserver and moved everything bit-by-bit there. And then,
> I've got this new machine with which I battled for weeks and couldn't get
> proftpd under vserver working ( while muddleftpd works flawlessly, but
> unfortunately does not provide the features I need ).
> So - congratulations on your working setup, you're lucky that you wasn't
> hit by the bug, keep your fingers crossed and remember to sacrifice black
> cock every other saturday to keep it that way, because there IS a bug.
hmm, although this for sure is funny, maybe
we could concentrate on findind a reason or
explanation for this behaviour, maybe by
writing a simple test application/scenario
which show this specific issue in a way I
can reproduce ... (proftpd isn't an option,
as this works for me too ;)
TIA,
Herbert
> regards,
> World's Best Bug Stumbler ( po naszemu - Katalizator Nieszczesc )
> --
> Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9
> Namagumi namagomi namagoroshi
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver