From: Paul Sladen (vserver_at_paul.sladen.org)
Date: Wed 15 Oct 2003 - 18:21:49 BST

• Previous message: Nočl Köthe: "Re: [vserver] VServer Platforms (Supported Architectures)"
• In reply to: Per R Laursen: "Re: Re[2]: [vserver] Bind9 in ctxXX, Was : vserver site design"
• Next in thread: Dariush Pietrzak: "Re: Re[2]: [vserver] Bind9 in ctxXX, Was : vserver site design"
• Next in thread: Alejandro Mery: "[vserver] Re: vserver site design"
• Reply: Dariush Pietrzak: "Re: Re[2]: [vserver] Bind9 in ctxXX, Was : vserver site design"

On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Per R Laursen wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 October 2003 08:22, Dariush Pietrzak <eyck_at_ghost.anime.pl> wrote:
> > Which ctx version fixes those previous problems?
> http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/howto.hc?projet=vserver&id=72

For gawd's sake. Do not do that. Giving a vserver the permission to take
down the system, just so that you can run a badly-compiled copy of Bind9, is
just stupid.

Read:

  http://www.paul.sladen.org/vserver/faq/#bind9

and/or email the Bind9 developers to stop trying to be too clever for
their own good!

        -Paul

-- 
War is inconsistent with Truth.  Nottingham, GB

• Previous message: Nočl Köthe: "Re: [vserver] VServer Platforms (Supported Architectures)"
• In reply to: Per R Laursen: "Re: Re[2]: [vserver] Bind9 in ctxXX, Was : vserver site design"
• Next in thread: Dariush Pietrzak: "Re: Re[2]: [vserver] Bind9 in ctxXX, Was : vserver site design"
• Next in thread: Alejandro Mery: "[vserver] Re: vserver site design"
• Reply: Dariush Pietrzak: "Re: Re[2]: [vserver] Bind9 in ctxXX, Was : vserver site design"