About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Sam Vilain (sam_at_vilain.net)
Date: Mon 01 Sep 2003 - 02:05:51 BST


On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 01:10, Rik van Riel wrote;

  Rv> Time to look at CKRM, which has the mechanisms to limit memory
  Rv> and cpu use of random contexts ... meaning we could simply bind
  Rv> one CKRM class to each vserver context and get the load separation
  Rv> we want.
  Rv> http://ckrm.sourceforge.net/

Hey, vserver with architecture!

I guess the question is, what features does vserver have that CKRM
doesn't?

I wonder if it's possible to port those features to CKRM, then get the
userland utilities to use CKRM instead of the original patch. It
seems like complete duplication of effort otherwise.

Or am I missing something simple?

-- 
Sam Vilain, sam_at_vilain.net

Real software engineers like C's structured constructs, but they are suspicious of it because they have heard that it lets you get "close to the machine."


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view
[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Mon 01 Sep 2003 - 02:24:53 BST by hypermail 2.1.3