From: Herbert Pötzl (herbert_at_13thfloor.at)
Date: Sat 19 Jul 2003 - 13:10:38 BST
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 12:57:06AM -0400, Alejandro Mery wrote:
> Herbert Pötzl wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 09:46:26PM -0400, Alejandro Mery Pellegrini wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>Herbert Pötzl wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 09:28:04PM -0400, Alejandro Mery wrote:
> >>>>will ctx-18 support JFS?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >what does 'supporting jfs' mean for _you_
> >(do _you_ consider it supported if ...)
> >
> >- the kernel can be compiled with jfs enabled?
> >- the kernel woks with jfs and on jfs partitions?
> >- immutable linkage invert is supported (unification)?
> >- quota (virtual) is supported on jfs?
> >
> >so you are supposed to choose one, and I am
> >then entitled to answer, 'yes of course', or
> >'sorry dude, that won't work' *grin* ...
> >
> >
> well... the question was:
> can the kernel be *succesfully* compiled with jfs enabled? what didn't
> happend a couple of month ago...
hope this will be fixed ...
> i assumed vquota patch was fs independent... but now i guess it isn't..
> same about unification :-(
> are vquota and unification supported on jfs?
sorry dude, but I guess not in this release ;) ...
best,
Herbert
>
> Regards,
> Alejandro Mery