From: Martin List-Petersen (martin_at_list-petersen.dk)
Date: Sun 29 Jun 2003 - 15:18:52 BST

• Previous message: Timm Essigke: "Re: [vserver] What's worse than Spam?"
• In reply to: Herbert Poetzl: "[vserver] What's worse than Spam?"
• Next in thread: Eje Gustafsson: "Re: [vserver] What's worse than Spam?"

On søn, 2003-06-29 at 11:56, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> What is worse than Spam on Mailing Lists?
>
> IMHO the folowing:
>
> - Virus Reports on previous Spam
> - Vacation/Out of Office Replies
> - Read Receipts
> - Spam Assasin Reports
> - Mailer Daemon Error Messages
>
> so stop the crap ...

I can see your point ...

This seems definatly to be a misconfigured MTA. The original
(virus-message) was quite clear:

Return-Path: <vserver.error_at_solucorp.qc.ca>
From: <big_at_boss.com>
To: <vserver_at_solucorp.qc.ca>
Reply-To: <vserver_at_solucorp.qc.ca>

Means, MTA should return mail to Return-Path: and MUA should reply to
Reply-To:

Some people really do weird configurations, or let's say: Why is
non-commercial antivirus software/wrappers more conform than commecial
ones (example: ScanMail) ?

Regards,
Martin List-Petersen
martin at list-petersen dot dk

• Previous message: Timm Essigke: "Re: [vserver] What's worse than Spam?"
• In reply to: Herbert Poetzl: "[vserver] What's worse than Spam?"
• Next in thread: Eje Gustafsson: "Re: [vserver] What's worse than Spam?"