About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Herbert Poetzl (herbert_at_13thfloor.at)
Date: Wed 12 Mar 2003 - 17:22:05 GMT


On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 09:03:49AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> Eje Gustafsson <Macahan_at_fament.com> writes:
>
> > Ok. Here we go. Crashed again. Got me another 48 hours of run time.
> > Just curious is ctx-14 or ctx-13 more stable then 16 and 15 ?
>
> We downgraded from 2.4.20ctx16 to 2.4.19ctx13 and this completely
> fixed our problems.

it should read: .. and this seems to have completely
fixed our problems ...

> Our uptime is now 20 days -- no reboot since the downgrade -- whereas
> before, it was limited to about 3 or 4.

I have 161 days uptime with 2.4.20-p8c13e and
72 days with 2.4.20-c16e ...

as a side note, the "scheduler" BUG appeared
somewhere in vanilla 2.4.13 and was "fixed" in
several occasions (PPP, nic, USB, etc) as the
kernel evolved ...

best,
Herbert


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view
[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Wed 12 Mar 2003 - 17:59:58 GMT by hypermail 2.1.3