About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Herbert Poetzl (herbert_at_13thfloor.at)
Date: Mon 25 Nov 2002 - 12:42:58 GMT


On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 12:19:08PM +0000, Sam Vilain wrote:
> On Saturday 23 November 2002 14:32, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > CAP_SYS_ADMIN is currently sufficient for complete
> > quota control, CAP_QUOTACTL enables root in a virtual
> > server to maintain the user quotas.
>
> How did you get around allowing the virtual server that is running the
> commands access to the disk device that the partition resides on?
>
> It's undesirable to allow root on a vserver to be able to open a block device
> directly (amplus nucleus violatus), which must be provided for some of the
> ioctl() commands required by quota commands.

quotactl() commands, not ioctls, and I use the
vroot proxy device described on my pages ...
http://www.13thfloor.at/VServer/HowTo_LVMQS.shtml

best,
Herbert

> The only sensible work-around involves userland passing of quota admin
> operations from one context to another, eg via an ssh forced command.
>
> Sam.


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view
[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Mon 25 Nov 2002 - 13:10:22 GMT by hypermail 2.1.3