About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Rik van Riel (riel_at_conectiva.com.br)
Date: Tue 23 Oct 2001 - 21:28:53 BST


On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Jacques Gelinas wrote:

> I am open to that. The effect we want to achieve is to have on vserver
> not taking all the machine for itself. So it does not have to be 100%
> fair.

> What is the impact of this goodness change btw ? Does the division is
> causing some evil effect ?

Goodness is called every time we reschedule, for all runnable
tasks. Adding a *division* to goodness() will really make things
slower...

My fair scheduling approach, OTOH, is completely implemented in
the recalculation code of the scheduler and doesn't touch the
fast path.

regards,

Rik

-- 
DMCA, SSSCA, W3C?  Who cares?  http://thefreeworld.net/  (volunteers needed)

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view
[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Wed 06 Nov 2002 - 07:03:38 GMT by hypermail 2.1.3