About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Rik van Riel (riel_at_conectiva.com.br)
Date: Tue 23 Oct 2001 - 20:32:11 BST


On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Jacques Gelinas wrote:

> + sched
>
> This changes the way priority is calculated for processes in a
> vserver. The priority is kind of aglomerated. A vserver running 50
> active processes will have a same impact on the server as if it was
> running a single process (roughly).

Arghhhhh, this changes the scheduler's _fast path_, not fun.

Should I port my fairsched patch to a newer 2.4 kernel and
add vserver support for it ? My approach only changes the
priority recalculation in the scheduler and achieves pretty
much the same effect _without_ needing to change goodness().

regards,

Rik

-- 
DMCA, SSSCA, W3C?  Who cares?  http://thefreeworld.net/  (volunteers needed)

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view
[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Wed 06 Nov 2002 - 07:03:38 GMT by hypermail 2.1.3